Sunday, September 16, 2007

Disturbing Rear Window

I didn't see it at the theater because I was one of the seven people in the country who chose to go see Grindhouse that weekend instead. The movie has a few effective suspense scenes, but for the most part it wasn't very good. It's premise is obviously derived from Rear Window (1954) – a housebound individual starts peeping on his neighbors and suspects that one of them is a murderer – but it felt like the filmmakers simply had no understanding of what made Hitchcock's version so effective and wonderful. Every change they made to the Rear Window template was a step in the wrong direction, betraying the central conceits of the story. So, I thought I'd jot down a few musings I've had about where Disturbia went wrong in its translation of Hitch...

First off, the central premise of the filming of Rear Window was that (with the exception of the final shot) the camera never leaves the room. In other words, the audience is stuck in the apartment for the whole film along with the James Stewart character, who has broken his leg. Much of the suspense comes from the claustrophobia of being in the room, and from the frustration of being unable to simply cross the courtyard to get a closer look in the neighbors' apartments. By tying his camera to the room, Hitchcock expertly monkeys with the conventions of Hollywood filmmaking: only James Stewart and his pals are granted close-ups; the rest of the neighbors are only seen in long shot. Big reveals in movies usually happen in close-ups. We also get to know more about the characters who appear in close-up. By denying the close-up for Stewart's neighbors – at best they are seen with a long lens from across the courtyard – Hitchcock interferes with the audience's familiar expectation of moving from wide to close shots to get a better look at things. Disturbia opens up the space a little more: Shia LeBoeuf's character is under house arrest and can move around most of his house and garden. That's all fine and good, as it gave us more places to explore and stopped the movie from just being a complete Rear Window clone. It made the mistake, however, of frequently letting the camera go outside the boundary of the house. In other words, the camera was given more freedom to roam than the character, and the audience never feels locked down like the character is. As a result, the film gave into the audience's desire to see more than the character can, and diluted the suspense by doing so.

This leads me to a second, related, complaint: like a lot of movies these days, Disturbia did not understand the concept of a restricted point-of-view. The whole premise of Rear Window works because we, the audience, are locked into the same point-of-view as the James Stewart character. We only learn things when he learns things. If we were to get ahead of him in the story, the film would be dead and would have nowhere to go. Disturbia blows this by allowing us get ahead of the Shia LeBoeuf character and see things that he does not see. Every time it does this, it drains the movie of suspense. The biggest impact this has is on our knowledge of the killer. In Rear Window, we are deprived of seeing the suspected killer in close-up until the very end of the film when he enters Stewart's apartment. In Disturbia, we are given lots of opportunity to see and get to know the killer, and we learn more about him than the main character knows – such as in the scene where he scares Sarah Roemer in her car or in the scene where the camera cuts to blood splatting on the neighbor's window (something none of the protagonists see). There is really no ambiguity about whether the neighbor is a killer or not because we know too much. Had the film stuck rigorously to LeBoeuf's point-of-view, and had it shown less of the neighbor, this would have been avoided.

The last point I'll discuss is the issue of voyeurism. Rear Window is all about the desire to look, and Hitchcock consciously implicates the film audience in James Stewart's voyeurism. Hitch is basically saying that all cinema audiences are peepers who get off on spying on other people's lives. By locking the camera to the room, by denying the audience close-ups, and by restricting our point-of-view to that of Stewart, Hitchcock is deliberately toying with our desire to look. And at the end of the movie, he is careful to punish Stewart's voyeurism by having him break his other leg. In this era of mobile devices and ubiquitous surveillance, Disturbia had the potential to explore similar issues about what it means to look in today's world. Of course, it doesn't seem to aim for that at all, and it ultimately ends up becoming something of a pro-surveillance movie: LeBoeuf is rewarded, not punished, for surveilling his neighbors; moreover, he even gets to use his surveillance prowess to get his revenge on the pesky kids across the street. I feel like I've seen a lot of movies in the past few years that offer up pro-surveillance narratives – Deja Vu (2006) and Next (2007) spring to mind – and this might be the most disturbing thing about Disturbia. Oh well, at least the neighbor wasn't Muslim...

Friday, September 7, 2007

Jeff Bridges in Jagged Edge

I know what you mean, Andrew, and I wondered myself; but I simply couldn't think of a fifth male whom I thought was better. I find Bridges' performance fascinating and disturbing: is it the actor's charm we respond to, or the character's? (AND HERE BE SPOILERS) Has he very successfully shielded his guilt from us, or is he genuinely deluded? That paradox holds me, and, though it isn't an obvious contender for one of the performances of the decade (I had Jack Nicholson in Terms of Endearment, Klaus Maria Brandauer in Out of Africa and William Hickey in Prizzi's Honor on my shortlist with Bridges), his underplaying and charisma do the job for me (I think).

As for the movie itself, I don't quite agree that it's Basic Instinct lite. Jagged Edge takes itself more seriously, and has a very effective thriller tone which makes me queasy. Its most powerful moments (e.g. the opening murder, the cross-examination of the training instructor by Glenn Close, and the ingenuity of the subplot involving the woman who was almost raped a year or so earlier) aren't matched by the later movie.

My one big problem with Jagged Edge is that, having carefully constructed its plot and successfully managed our changing allegiances for most of its running time, it gives up ten minutes before the end with Close's foolish response to the finding of the typewriter, her 'everything's okay' moment on the 'phone at her home existing purely so the final confrontation can occur. Even though I prefer Basic Instinct, and admire and enjoy its mise en scène, its general politically incorrect hi-jinks, and the strut of Sharon Stone's performance, Jagged Edge is a movie which I feel continues to hold up well.

And besides... 'He was trash!'

Code of the Virgin

I wonder if this was a coincidence or not...

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Death Sentence (2007)

Death Sentence is the latest Kevin Bacon opus. It's a grim, nasty vigilante/revenge film that's a lot of fun if you like that kind of thing. Bacon stars as Nick Hume, a risk assessor whose rational world view and comfortable, middle-class existence is shattered when his son is the victim of a random killing at a ghetto gas station. He decides to take matters into his own hands by killing the gangbanger responsible for his son's death, but things don't quite turn out the way that he had imagined. The movie awkwardly tries to make some kind of half-assed statement about class difference, but it's a pretty vacuous and illogical film at the end of the day. It is, however, quite gripping and pleasingly bleak: unlike most movies these days, this is not a film where you should expect a happy ending with the dysfunctional family getting back together in recognition of the fact that they really love one another. It also features a strong, off-the-deep-end central performance from Bacon; and John Goodman adds some enjoyably theatrical gusto to his poorly written character.

The film is mostly aiming to resurrect the style and attitude of seventies-era vigilante/revenge cinema: e.g. Walking Tall (1973), Death Wish (1974), Taxi Driver (1976), Rolling Thunder (1977), Walking the Edge (1980), Death Wish II (1981), Ms. 45 (1981), Vigilante (1983). In particular, it is based on the sequel to the novel of Death Wish; the final sequence of the film borrows rather too heavily from from Taxi Driver; and the poster art takes its cues from Walking Tall (click image to enlarge). The pleasures of Death Sentence in this regard are of a second-hand nature, but it got me thinking a little bit about why I find these films pleasurable in the first place.

Vigilante and revenge films are often labeled right-wing fantasies: the individualistic, macho, white male protects what is his through violent revenge. The justice system is ineffective and operates like a nanny state for criminals, giving the bad guys more rights than the victims. This is certainly true of many of the aforementioned revenge films, but I think the politics of these films go deeper than this surface reading. In many ways, they are all modern westerns. The western as a genre usually focused on the tension between a lawless frontier and a building of civilization. Different westerns propose different interpretations of how those tensions played out in the foundational myths of America. For example, the final shot of The Searchers – arguably the most famous shot of any western – has John Wayne walking away from the camera and out into the wilderness, with the shot framed through an open doorway. In other words, our point-of-view is from inside the house, from within civilization; Wayne has proven by this point that he has no place within, and must take his place on the outside of civilization instead.

In vigilante/revenge movies, a similar set of tensions form the core of the narratives, only now we are in the present day. The laws and rules of civilization are presented as having failed us; the police protect the criminals. The lone vigilante, usually a mild-mannered, middle-class guy who's been playing by the rules until the rules have failed him, is a figure who snaps and comes to embody the pre-civilized qualities of the animal or the gunslinger or the warrior. He enters a heterotopic space on the outskirts of the civilized world, and he represents a return of the things that middle-class American society has repressed. He becomes a fierce beast demanding some kind of moral center in a society that's gone out-of-whack. (It is perhaps no coincidence that these films have mostly been popular during corrupt Republican presidencies!)

Death Sentence
is a good example of this tradition, with Bacon's rational world view slowly unraveling, revealing his flaws as a father and husband, as well as his inner animal. I think it is this set of tensions that interests me in revenge movies. Even in the revenge films that skew more to the right in their politics, this basic set of tensions still leaves ample ambiguity and richness for liberal lefties like myself to enjoy.

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

It Begins

So far so good for my prophecy of a strong finish to the year in movies. I caught two over the holiday weekend...

I got hooked into this movie early on, not so much from the fact that the action starts right away but because I quickly liked the lead characters played by Russell Crowe and Christian Bale. Your opinion of the movie will probably be shaped by how you feel about them as well, because the plot certainly isn't a mystery. The trajectory of the story is pretty obvious from early on, even if you haven't seen the trailers. The real trick is that the movie is still able to stay suspenseful and tense. In addition to the leading performances, Ben Foster is memorable as Crowe's 2nd in command. The dialogue is strong, and there are some cool action sequences. My only complaint is with the finale, in which believability flies out the window in far too many ways. But this wasn't enough to rob me of my overall enjoyment of the movie.


IMDB lists the year of this film as 2006, so I am not sure if the film has already played on the other side of the pond ages ago, but it was recently released in L.A. "Deep Water" tells the story of Donald Chowhurst, an amateur sailor who entered a race in 1968 to be the first man to sail around the world alone without stopping. I knew nothing about what would happen next before seeing the film, and I highly recommend being as ignorant as I was if at all possible. One of the great strengths of the movie is the deliberate manner of revealing plot progression and character development in a most suspenseful manner. There is also a wide scope of human emotions powerfully captured in the tight 90-minute movie. The filmmakers make great use of all sorts of media to keep the storytelling varied and engaging. But most importantly, Donald Chowhurst is a compelling figure, the kind of guy who would clearly capture the fascination of Werner Herzog. I really enjoyed "Deep Water", and would also love to see a Herzog dramatization somewhere down the road.

Saturday, September 1, 2007

Movies in 2007 A.D.

I recently told Andrew that 2007 was a good year for movies, but then realized I only said that because I happened to see two good movies in one week (“Rescue Dawn” and “Sunshine”). At first I backpedaled from the statement, but I now assert that I might have been prescient in that observation. I think there are some very promising movies on the horizon…

3:10 to Yuma
(Opening September 7th, although I got tickets for a preview screening tomorrow)

I don’t know why, but I am in the mood for a Western. I also like Christian Bale, and have to admit that Russell Crowe is usually pretty good. I just watched the DVD of “The Insider” last night. That’s a damn good movie, and Michael Mann is a solid director.

Eastern Promises
(Opening September 14th)

Another David Cronenberg movie with Viggo Mortensen dealing with crime families. And Naomi Watts is in this one.

The Darjeeling Limited
(Opening September 29th)

I like Wes Anderson, although “The Life Aquatic” was kind of uneven and made me think he might be better when he doesn’t have the budget to do whatever he wants. Still, I am interested to check out anything Anderson does.

American Gangster
(Opening Nov 2nd)

Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe are pretty dope leads, it looks like an epic crime movie, and Ridley Scott will be trying to make up for the lameness of “A Good Year”.

No Country for Old Men

(Opening November 9th)

The second I saw the trailer for this movie, I texted Andrew from the theater with, “The Coens are back!” This looks like “Blood Simple” territory. So excited!!

Youth Without Youth

(Opening December 14th)

I miss Tim Roth and am excited to see him in the lead, as well as what Coppola is up to.

Sweeny Todd
(Opening December 21st)

I have seen this show live and it is really dark, particularly for a musical. Tim Burton directing and Johnny Depp starring definitely makes me curious.

There Will Be Blood
(Opening December 26th)

A new P.T.A. movie. Daniel Day-Lewis as the bad guy. Yessssssssss.

Friday, August 31, 2007

Edward's Best of the 1980s

1. The Shining (1980)

Even after multiple viewings, The Shining still frightens and haunts me. Jack Nicholson plays a struggling writer who takes a job as caretaker at a hotel in the mountains during the isolated winter months. When he moves his wife (Shelley Duvall) and young son (Danny Lloyd) in, things start to go very, very wrong. I've never been a fan of Kubrick, but I love this film immensely: the controlled directorial style allows the natural horrors of the situation to seep through. And given that the film is about a writer's paranoia, it's only right that we have ample time to become as convinced as he is that malign forces are at work in the labyrinthine hotel. Nicholson is splendid, both fearsome and touching, yet always entertaining, while Duvall is just superb as his strung-out wife, a good woman driven to the brink of breakdown by her terrifying husband while trying to do what she can to save her disturbed, 'shining' son. Almost every scene in this film is great, yet the set-pieces are never pretentious or artificial, and always move the story along effectively.

2. The Stunt Man (1980)

Okay, okay, okay, it's in my top ten! I admit it, this was not an easy choice to make. There were half a dozen movies which could have been here instead, all of which probably give me more guaranteed pleasure with each viewing. But The Stunt Man is a unique film, with unique pleasures. Richard Rush has had a halting, marginal career, but with this film, he did his bit: it's the work of a lifetime. Steve Railsback's harassed, paranoid Viet vet is put through his paces - and then some - by Peter O'Toole's dictatorial director, who is willing to use anyone and everyone - including leading lady Barbara Hershey - in his quest to make his war film. How the stunt man negotiates these supremely choppy and unenviable waters makes for a terrifically involving story, with no end of surprising and offbeat directorial coups. Bonus points for the dog licking its balls in the opening sequence, the night-time scene between Railsback and Hershey before the big final day, and especially Dominic Frontiere's rascally score, which gets endless mileage out of its witty theme tune.

3. The Great Muppet Caper (1981)

Jim Henson's artistic sensibility was perfectly suited to kids, his work full of classic entertainment - songs, silly voices, and sweet, sophisticated humour - while also having educational value and a gentle morality. The Muppet films were a very successful extension of the TV series, and The Great Muppet Caper is a really excellent movie for all ages. Kermit, Fozzie and Gonzo are reporters sent to London to cover the theft of fashionista Lady Holliday's diamond. She (Diana Rigg) is a grande dame par excellence, but unaware that her layabout brother (Charles Grodin) is the thief. And of course, Miss Piggy falls for Kermit... What seals the deal with this film is the terrific cluster of songs, composed by Joe Raposo in the style of classical American showbiz entertainment - among other things, this film deserves to be seen as a top movie musical. I loved it and watched it repeatedly when I was a kid, didn't see it for twenty years, and now, on seeing it again, realise that it has stood the test of time.

4. Stop Making Sense (1984)

I was a little surprised that this didn't make Andrew's top ten, but perhaps it was close? For me, this concert movie, directed by Jonathan Demme, and with not a little artistic input from David Byrne, is so comprehensively put together that it transcends its 'live' origins to create a series of abstract musical puzzles, perfectly ordered and paced, and totally satisfying, intellectually and musically. Byrne makes a great front man, the rest of the band plays tight - and really enjoy the music they create - and the makers work wonders with camera angles, lighting, and off-the-cuff filming. So strong a film it is, I would wager that you don't need to be a Talking Heads fan to enjoy it.

5. Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters (1985)

Paul Schrader's best film, and one which deserved to do better - or even some - business. It's a biopic of Japan's famous post-war writer Yukio Mishima, told in three parallel strands - naturalistic recreation of the last day of his life, black and white account of his early years, and lush, multi-coloured recreations of scenes from some of his novels. This structure is fitting for someone who sought, his whole life, to unite his work and his desire for action, which, here, he finally does, in the 'harmony of pen and sword'. Helped by his reserved leading man Ken Ogata, Schrader presents Mishima as a multi-faceted and conflicted character - prolific author, celebrity, traditionalist, lover of Western culture, closeted homosexual and militarised, self-styled outcast. The visual surprises and glories are matched by Philip Glass's iconic score - those wonderfully ominous cells of music - and amazing production and costume design. It's one of the best films about the pleasure and pain of being a writer, and a very literate, unconventional biopic.

6. Come and See (1985)

This is a movie which has a mighty and awesome reputation, wholly deserved. Elem Klimov's final film (he felt he had nothing more to say after having made it) is an account of the Nazi stranglehold on Belarus in the Second World War. This terrible period is seen through the eyes of an adolescent boy, Florya (Alexei Kravchenko, billed as A. Kravchenko), who has run away to join the guerrillas and gets an abrupt, and unforgettable, lesson in the art of war. Klimov anchors the movie in a firm reality, then embellishes it with surrealistic touches which increase our identification with Florya's experience - the high-pitched whistle on the soundtrack when the boy is rendered temporarily deaf by bombing, the toppling trees, the wade through the swamp, and the whole second half of the film, which, with its extended Nazi atrocities, is as terrifying and devastating as movies can get. But it's ironic that when a movie actually earns those overused epithets, it does so by showing how futile such descriptions are; Come and See just needs to be seen. The only thing about it which will lift your spirits is the excellence of the moviemaking itself.

7. Crazy Love (1987)

Young Belgian writer-director Dominique Deruddere made a splash with this, his first feature film. Adapted from writings by Charles Bukowski, it's the three-part story of a young man's coming of age, and is a movie which shines a pallid light on the gulf between the ideal of love and the messy, real thing. As a young boy, Harry Voss (Geert Hunaerts) falls for a blonde beauty on the silver screen and is then traumatised by his older friend's initiation into the world of dating and, ahem, girls. A few years later, and suffering from a monstrous case of acne, Harry (now played by Josse de Pauw) finds himself the outcast at the end-of-year disco, but desperate to make an impression on the school sweetheart. Lastly, as an alcoholic adult, Harry must confront his demons when he finds the beautifully preserved corpse of what is probably his ideal woman. By turns funny, farcical, macabre and downright tragic, Crazy Love is a striking and profound movie, a triumph of Belgian cinema, which rides its disturbing sexual and emotional shenanigans on a wave of heartfelt compassion.

8. Moonstruck (1987)

Whatever happened to the romantic comedy genre seems to stem from when they became commonly known as romcoms. Because these days, I never see a good one. Notting Hill is about the best we've had, and it's sweet, silly and, I suppose, romantic, but back in 1987 we had Moonstruck, and thank goodness we still have it today. Plot is simple: lonesome Italian-American widow Loretta (Cher) gets engaged to mamma's boy Johnny (Danny Aiello) and then promptly falls for his estranged brother Ronny (Nicolas Cage). What's a girl to do? Well, it would be helpful to notice the big full moon hovering over Brooklyn, which seems to be setting off Loretta's whole family on various romantic escapades, while Loretta herself has 'those ugly greys' removed from her hair, gets dolled up and goes to La Bohème at the Met with the man she's trying not to fall in love with! Moonstruck, superbly written by John Patrick Shanley and effervescently directed by Norman Jewison, is a magical movie, chock-full of witty lines, demonstrative performances and affairs of the heart. It's a movie imbued with the spirit of the commedia all'Italiana, and Cher proves herself an actress worthy of the status of Sophia Loren.

9. Nuovo Cinema Paradiso (1988)

Writer-director Giuseppe Tornatore had made only one film before this catapulted him to international attention. It's easy to see why it lapped up audiences: in its tale of the friendship across the years between a young boy and a cinema projectionist at a small cinema in Sicily, it tells a simple, touching story, while also paying tribute to the very act of movie-going. But Nuovo Cinema Paradiso strikes a deeper chord than mere adulation: it builds its story on a bedrock of disappointment, missed opportunities, loss and regret, which goes a long way to counterbalancing the sentimentality for the provincial movie house of the title, a balance sustained by Ennio and Andrea Morricone's luscious but aching orchestral score. It's important to note that these qualities come through much louder and clearer in the director's cut, which flopped upon initial release, was edited down into the Oscar-winning extravaganza everybody knows, and was then re-released to more acclaim in the '90s. There are charming and effective performances from the three actors who play central character Totò: Salvatore Cascio as the young boy, Marco Leonardi as the lovelorn youth, and Jacques Perrin as the celebrated, but unhappy filmmaker in middle age; while Philippe Noiret plays the cantankerous but always loveable projectionist, whose wisdom might be summed up as 'cruel to be kind'.

10. Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989)

Woody Allen was, for me, the filmmaker of the decade, with pretty much all of his films from this period being a cut above the norm. Broadway Danny Rose, The Purple Rose of Cairo and Hannah and Her Sisters are all yapping at the coat-tails (or pasta-covered table cloth) of my '80s top ten; Crimes and Misdemeanors trumps them all and remains for me, with Annie Hall, Allen's best work. It's a film which takes on a weighty issue - how to have morals in a godless universe - and tackles it through two stories in one: a dark and dramatic tale of a philandering opthamologist (Martin Landau) who is toying with having his mistress (Anjelica Huston) bumped off and a witty love triangle involving Woody Allen's hapless documentary filmmaker, Mia Farrow's sweet and pragmatic production manager and Alan Alda's pompous television magnate. Through juggling these narrative strands, Allen creates a fully-rounded portrait of life's ups and downs, and presides over uniformly excellent performances from his extensive cast. And, given that his concentration on the bourgeoisie has attracted some criticism over the years, this film, like the later Match Point, uses its privileged characters in order to comment on the corrupting nature of power and money, and the necessary endurance of the opposites.

Ten performances of the decade

Men:

A. Kravchenko in Come and See (1985)
Jeff Bridges in Jagged Edge (1985)
Jon Voight in Runaway Train (1985)
Sean Connery in The Name of the Rose (1986)
James Woods in Salvador (1986)

Women:

Shelley Duvall in The Shining (1980)
Diane Keaton in Reds (1981)
Meryl Streep in Silkwood (1983)
Sigourney Weaver in Aliens (1986)
Cher in Moonstruck (1987)

Friday, August 24, 2007

Late Homework 3: Ed's Performances Redux

Well, I can't resist! As you guys have chosen five men and five women for each decade, I figured I'd better add to my measly three! So here is a recap of my performance picks from the 2000s and the 1990s with the choices upped to five apiece. My '80s performances will appear with my top ten list in a few days' time.

2000s:

Men:

Michael Douglas in Wonder Boys (2000)
Anderson Ballesteros in Our Lady of the Assassins (2000)
Olivier Gourmet in Le Fils (2002)
Morgan Marinne in Le Fils (2002)
Maurice Bénichou in Caché (2005)

Women:

Charlotte Rampling in Under the Sand (2000)
Laura Elena Harring in Mulholland Drive (2001)
Naomi Watts in Mulholland Drive (2001)
Isabelle Huppert in The Piano Teacher (2001)
Julie Delpy in Before Sunset (2004)

1990s:

Men:

Gérard Depardieu in Cyrano de Bergerac (1990)
Al Pacino in Dick Tracy (1990)
Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven (1992)
Sean Penn in Carlito's Way (1993)
Robert Forster in Jackie Brown (1997)

Women:

Jodie Foster in The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
Judy Davis in Husbands and Wives (1992)
Meryl Streep in The Bridges of Madison County (1995)
Judi Dench in Shakespeare in Love (1998)
Julia Roberts in Notting Hill (1999)

Late Homework 2: Later Homework


Ten Performances of the 2000s:


The Gentlemen:

  • Michael Nyqvist – Together (2000)
  • Chiwetel Ejiofor – Dirty Pretty Things (2002)
  • Thomas Jane – Stander (2003)
  • Jack Black – School of Rock (2003)
  • Michael Shannon – Bug (2006)
The Ladies:
  • Molly Parker – The Center of the World (2001)
  • Naomi Watts – Mulholland Dr. (2001)
  • Charlize Theron – Monster (2003)
  • Julie Delpy – Before Sunset (2004)
  • Catherine Keener – The 40 Year Old Virgin (2005)

Ten Performances of the 1990s:

The Ladies:
  • Jodie Foster – The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
  • Irène Jacob – Three Colors: Red (1994)
  • Radha Mitchell – High Art (1998)
  • Samantha Morton – Jesus' Son (1999)
  • Melora Walters – Magnolia (1999)
The Gentlemen:
  • Tim Roth – Reservoir Dogs (1992)
  • Sean Penn – Carlito’s Way (1993)
  • Jeffrey Wright – Basquiat (1996)
  • Robert Forster – Jackie Brown (1997)
  • Don Cheadle – Boogie Nights (1997)

Late Homework

I have been lax on my homework, not including favorite performances with my lists. So here are my top ten favorite performance per decade, to catch up on the three released lists...

Top Ten Performances of the 2000s

The Men:

Terrence Howard - Hustle and Flow (2005)
Chiwetel Ejiofor - Dirty Pretty Things (2002)
Daniel Day-Lewis - Gangs of New York (2002)
Fred Willard - Best in Show (2000)
Mark Ruffalo - You Can Count on Me (2000)

The Women:

Kate Winslet - Little Children (2006)
Reese Witherspoon - Walk the Line (2005)
Rachel McAdams - Wedding Crashers (2005)
Naomi Watts - Mulholland Drive (2001)
Ellen Burstyn - Requiem for a Dream (2000)

Top Ten Performances of the 1990s

The Women:

Melora Walters - Magnolia (1999)
Genevieve Bujold - The House of Yes (1997)
Catherine Keener - Living in Oblivion (1995)
Natalie Portman - The Professional (1994)
Marcia Gay Harden - Miller’s Crossing (1990)

The Men:

Jude Law - The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999)
Ed Norton - American History X (1998)
Sean Penn - Carlito’s Way (1993)
Jeff Bridges - Fearless (1993)
Jack Lemmon - Glengarry Glen Ross (1992)

Top Ten Performances of the 1980s

The Men:

Billy Zane - Dead Calm (1989)
Kevin Kline - A Fish Called Wanda (1988)
Alan Rickman - Die Hard (1988)
Paul Newman - The Color of Money (1986)
Jack Nicholson - The Shining (1980)

The Women:

Nicole Kidman - Dead Calm (1989)
Ellen Barkin - Sea of Love (1989)
Susan Sarandon - Bull Durham (1988)
Sigourney Weaver - Aliens (1986)
Jennifer Jason Leigh - Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982)